Opal is a source-to-source compiler, so there is no VM as such and the compiled code aims to be as fast and efficient as possible, mapping directly to underlying javascript features and objects where possible.
nil # => nil
true # => true
false # => false
self # => self
self is mostly compiled to this. Methods and blocks are implemented
as javascript functions, so their this value will be the right
self value. Class bodies and the top level scope use a self variable
to improve readability.
nil is compiled to a nil javascript variable. nil is a real object
which allows methods to be called on it. Opal cannot send methods to null
or undefined, and they are considered bad values to be inside ruby code.
true and false are compiled directly into their native boolean equivalents. This makes interaction a lot easier as there is no need to convert values to opal specific values.
Because true and false compile to their native
javascript equivalents, they must share the same class: Boolean.
For this reason, they do not belong to their respective TrueClass
and FalseClass classes from ruby.
"hello world!" # => "hello world!"
:foo # => "foo"
<<-EOS # => "Hello there.\n"
Hello there.
EOS
Ruby strings are compiled directly into JavaScript strings for performance as well as readability. This has the side effect that Opal does not support mutable strings - i.e. all strings are immutable.
Strings in Opal are immutable because they are compiled into regular JavaScript strings. This is done for performance reasons.
For performance reasons, symbols are also compiled directly into strings.
Opal supports all the symbol syntaxes, but does not have a real Symbol
class. Symbols and Strings can therefore be used interchangeably.
In Opal there is a single class for numbers; Numeric. To keep Opal
as performant as possible, Ruby numbers are mapped to native numbers.
This has the side effect that all numbers must be of the same class.
Most relevant methods from Integer, Float and Numeric are
implemented on this class.
42 # => 42
3.142 # => 3.142
Ruby arrays are compiled directly into JavaScript arrays. Special Ruby syntaxes for word arrays etc are also supported.
[1, 2, 3, 4] # => [1, 2, 3, 4]
%w[foo bar baz] # => ["foo", "bar", "baz"]
Inside a generated Ruby script, a function Opal.hash is available which
creates a new hash. This is also available in JavaScript as Opal.hash
and simply returns a new instance of the Hash class.
{ :foo => 100, :baz => 700 } # => Opal.hash("foo", 100, "baz", 700)
{ foo: 42, bar: [1, 2, 3] } # => Opal.hash("foo", 42, "bar", [1, 2, 3])
Similar to hash, there is a function Opal.range available to create
range instances.
1..4 # => Opal.range(1, 4, true)
3...7 # => Opal.range(3, 7, false)
As per Ruby, Opal treats only false and nil as falsy, everything
else is a truthy value including "", 0 and []. This differs from
JavaScript as these values are also treated as false.
For this reason, most truthy tests must check if values are false or
nil.
Taking the following test:
val = 42
if val
return 3.142;
end
This would be compiled into:
val = 42;
if (val !== false && val !== nil && val != null) {
return 3.142
} else {
return nil
};
This makes the generated truthy tests (if statements, and checks and
or statements) a little more verbose in the generated code.
Instance variables in Opal work just as expected. When ivars are set or
retrieved on an object, they are set natively without the @ prefix.
This allows real JavaScript identifiers to be used which is more
efficient then accessing variables by string name.
@foo = 200
@foo # => 200
@bar # => nil
This gets compiled into:
this.foo = 200;
this.foo; // => 200
this.bar; // => nil
If an instance variable uses the same name as a reserved JavaScript keyword,
then the instance variable is wrapped using the object-key notation: this['class'].
As described above, a compiled Ruby source gets generated into a string of JavaScript code that is wrapped inside an anonymous function. This looks similar to the following:
(function(Opal) {
// some setup code code
return self.$puts("foo")
})(Opal);
As a complete example, assuming the following code:
puts "foo"
This would compile directly into:
(function(Opal) {
var self = Opal.top, $nesting = [], nil = Opal.nil, $breaker = Opal.breaker, $slice = Opal.slice;
Opal.add_stubs(['$puts']);
return self.$puts("foo")
})(Opal);
TIP: you can see the compiled code with this command: opal --compile --no-exit --no-opal --eval 'puts "foo"'
If you write the generated code as above into a file app.js and add
that to your HTML page, then it is obvious that "foo" would be
written to the browser's console.
Because Opal does not aim to be fully compatible with Ruby, there are some instances where things can break and it may not be entirely obvious what went wrong.
As Opal just generates JavaScript, it is useful to use a native debugger to work through JavaScript code. To use a debugger, simply add an x-string similar to the following at the place you wish to debug:
# .. code
`debugger`
# .. more code
The x-strings just pass the debugger statement straight through to the JavaScript output.
All local variables and method/block arguments also keep their Ruby
names except in the rare cases when the name is reserved in JavaScript.
In these cases, a $ suffix is added to the name
(e.g. try → try$).
Opal tries to interact as cleanly with JavaScript and its api as much as possible. Ruby arrays, strings, numbers, regexps, blocks and booleans are just JavaScript native equivalents. The only boxed core features are hashes.
As most of the corelib deals with these low level details, Opal provides a special syntax for inlining JavaScript code. This is done with x-strings or "backticks", as their Ruby use has no useful translation in the browser.
`window.title`
# => "Opal: Ruby to JavaScript compiler"
%x{
console.log("opal version is:");
console.log(#{ RUBY_ENGINE_VERSION });
}
# => opal version is:
# => 0.6.0
Even interpolations are supported, as seen here.
This feature of inlining code is used extensively, for example in Array#length:
class Array
def length
`this.length`
end
end
X-Strings also have the ability to automatically return their value, as used by this example.
Reposted from: Mikamayhem
Opal standard lib (stdlib) includes a Native module. To use it, you need to download and reference native.js. You can find the latest minified one from the CDN here.
Let's see how it works and wrap window:
require 'native'
win = Native(`window`) # equivalent to Native::Object.new(`window`)
Now what if we want to access one of its properties?
win[:location][:href] # => "http://dev.mikamai.com/"
win[:location][:href] = "http://mikamai.com/" # will bring you to mikamai.com
And what about methods?
win.alert('hey there!')
So let’s do something more interesting:
class << win
# A cross-browser window close method (works in IE!)
def close!
%x{
return (#@native.open('', '_self', '') && #@native.close()) ||
(#@native.opener = null && #@native.close()) ||
(#@native.opener = '' && #@native.close());
}
end
# let's assign href directly
def href= url
self[:location][:href] = url
end
end
That’s all for now, bye!
win.close!
You can make direct JavaScript method calls on using the recv.JS.method
syntax. For example, if you have a JavaScript object named foo and want to call the
bar method on it with no arguments, with or without parentheses:
# javascript: foo.bar()
foo.JS.bar
foo.JS.bar()
You can call the JavaScript methods with arguments, with or without parentheses, just like Ruby methods:
# JavaScript: foo.bar(1, "a")
foo.JS.bar(1, :a)
foo.JS.bar 1, :a
You can call the JavaScript methods with argument splats:
# JavaScript: ($a = foo).bar.apply($a, [1].concat([2, 3]))
foo.JS.bar(1, *[2, 3])
foo.JS.bar 1, *[2, 3]
You can provide a block when making a JavaScript method call, and it will be converted to a JavaScript function added as the last argument to the method:
# JavaScript:
# ($a = (TMP_1 = function(arg){
# var self = TMP_1.$$s || this;
# if (arg == null) arg = nil;
# return "" + (arg.method()) + " " + (self.$baz(3))
# },
# TMP_1.$$s = self, TMP_1),
# foo.bar)(1, 2, $a);
foo.JS.bar(1, 2){|arg| arg.JS.method + baz(3)}
Note how self is set for the JavaScript function passed as an argument. This
allows normal Ruby block behavior to work when passing blocks to JavaScript
methods.
The .JS. syntax is recognized as a special token by the lexer, so if you have
a Ruby method named JS that you want to call, you can add a space to call it:
# call Ruby JS method on foo, call Ruby bar method on result
foo. JS.bar
You can get JavaScript properties using the recv.JS[:property] syntax:
# JavaScript: foo["bar"]
foo.JS[:bar]
This also works for JavaScript array access:
# JavaScript: foo[2]
foo.JS[2]
You can set JavaScript properties using this as the left hand side in an assignment:
# JavaScript: foo["bar"] = 1
foo.JS[:bar] = 1
This also works for setting values in a JavaScript array:
# JavaScript: foo[2] = "a"
foo.JS[2] = :a
Like the recv.JS.method syntax, .JS[ is recognized as a special token by
the lexer, so if you want to call the Ruby JS method on a object and then
call the Ruby [] method on the result, you can add a space:
# call Ruby JS method on foo, call Ruby [] method on result with :a argument
foo. JS[:a]
Opal has a js library in the stdlib that provides a JS module which can
be used to call JavaScript operators such as new. Example:
require 'js'
# new foo(bar)
JS.new(foo, bar)
# delete foo["bar"]
JS.delete(foo, :bar)
# "bar" in foo
JS.in(:bar, foo)
# foo instanceof bar
JS.instanceof(foo, bar)
# typeof foo
JS.typeof(foo)
You can also use the js library to call JavaScript global functions via
JS.call:
require 'js'
# parseFloat("1.1")
JS.call(:parseFloat, "1.1")
For convenience, method_missing is aliased to call, allowing you to call
global JavaScript methods directly on the JS module:
require 'js'
# parseFloat("1.1")
JS.parseFloat("1.1")
If you want to integrate a JavaScript library with Opal, so that you can make Ruby calls, you can choose one of the following options:
Use backticks: This is the quickest, simplest approach to integrating: call the native JavaScript code directly; it may provide a slight performance benefit, but also produces "ugly" Ruby code riddled with JavaScript. It's ideal for occasional calls to a JavaScript library.
Use .JS: You can make direct JavaScript method calls on using the recv.JS.method syntax. It is very similar to using backticks but looks more like ruby.
Use Native: Native provides a reasonable Ruby-like wrapper around JavaScript objects. This provides a quick in-term solution if no dedicated Ruby wrapper library exists.
Create your own Wrapper Library: If you use the library a lot, you can create your own Ruby library that wraps the JavaScript calls (which call Native or use backticks under the hood). This provides the best abstraction (eg. you can provide high-level calls that provide functionality, regardless of if the underlying JavaScript call flows change).
Accessing classes and methods defined in Opal from the JavaScript runtime is
possible via the Opal JS object. Consider following code:
module Bar
BAR = 123
end
class Foo
include Bar
FOO = 456
def foo
puts "called #foo on class ::Foo defined in Ruby code"
end
end
BAZ = 789
Top level constants can be accessed as properties of Opal:
Opal.Object; // => Object
Opal.Kernel; // => Kernel
Opal.Array; // => Array
Opal.RUBY_VERSION; // => "2.3"
Opal.Foo; // => Foo
Opal.BAZ; // => 789
To reach nested constants the safest way is to call #const_get on Object:
Opal.Object.$$const_get('Bar::BAR'); // => 123
Opal.Object.$$const_get('Foo::BAR'); // => 123
Opal.Object.$$const_get('Foo::FOO'); // => 456
Opal.Object.$$const_get('BAZ'); // => 789
Constants can also be navigated using the $$ property, although this is limited to constants defined directly under the current object:
Opal.Bar.$$.BAR // => 123
Opal.Foo.$$.FOO // => 456
Opal.Foo.$$.BAR // => undefined
Methods are always prefixed by a single $:
// Equivalent to:
// Foo.new.foo
Opal.Foo.$new().$foo(); // => "called #foo on class ::Foo defined in Ruby code"
// Equivalent to:
// "hello there".sub('there', 'world')
("hello there").$sub('there', 'world'); // => "hello world"
Methods names unsupported in JS should be called using the JS bracket notation:
// Equivalent to:
// hash = Hash.new["key"] = "value"
// hash["key"] = "value"
var hash = Opal.Hash.$new(); // => {}
hash["$[]="]("key", "value"); // => "value"
// Equivalent to:
// [1,2,3].reverse!
[1,2,3]['$reverse!'](); // => [3,2,1]
// Equivalent to:
// 1 == 2
(1)['$=='](2); // => false
Passing blocks from JS is a bit more tricky, so the suggested solution is to use Opal.send(…):
// Equivalent to:
// [1,2,3].map {|n| n * 2}
Opal.send([1,2,3], 'map', [], function(n) {return n * 2}); // => [2,4,6]
Alternatively blocks can also be called the hard way by assigning the block-function to the property $$p of the method:
// Equivalent to:
// [1,2,3].map {|n| n * 2}
array = [1,2,3]
array.$map.$$p = function(n) {return n * 2}; // "$$p" stands for "proc"
array.$map(); // => [2,4,6]
Since Ruby hashes are implemented directly with an Opal class, there's no "toll-free" bridging available (unlike with strings and arrays, for example). However, it's quite possible to interact with hashes from JavaScript:
var myHash = Opal.hash({a: 1, b: 2});
// output of $inspect: {"a"=>1, "b"=>2}
myHash.$store('a', 10);
// output of $inspect: {"a"=>10, "b"=>2}
myHash.$fetch('b','');
// 2
myHash.$fetch('z','');
// ""
myHash.$update(Opal.hash({b: 20, c: 30}));
// output of $inspect: {"a"=>10, "b"=>20, "c"=>30}
myHash.$to_n(); // provided by the Native module
// output: {"a": 10, "b": 20, "c": 30} aka a standard JavaScript object
Be aware Hash#to_n produces a duplicate copy of the hash.
Opal supports method_missing. This is a key feature of Ruby, and Opal wouldn't be much use without it! This page details the implementation of method_missing for Opal.
Firstly, a Ruby call foo.bar 1, 2, 3 is compiled into the following JavaScript:
foo.$bar(1, 2, 3)
This should be pretty easy to read. The bar method has a $ prefix just to distinguish it from underlying JavaScript properties, as well as Ruby ivars. Methods are compiled like this to make the generated code really readable.
method_missingJavaScript does not have an equivalent of method_missing, so how do we handle it? If a function is missing in JavaScript, then a language level exception will be raised.
To get around this, we make use of our compiler. During parsing, we collect a list of all method calls made inside a Ruby file, and this gives us a list of all possible method calls. We then add stub methods to the root object prototype (an Opal object, not the global JavaScript Object) which will proxy our method missing calls for us.
For example, assume the following Ruby script:
first 1, 2, 3
second "wow".to_sym
After parsing, we know we only ever call 3 methods: [:first, :second, :to_sym]. So, imagine we could just add these 3 methods to BasicObject in Ruby, we would get something like this:
class BasicObject
def first(*args, &block)
method_missing(:first, *args, &block)
end
def second(*args, &block)
method_missing(:second, *args, &block)
end
def to_sym(*args, &block)
method_missing(:to_sym, *args, &block)
end
end
It is obvious from here, that unless an object defines any given method, it will always resort in a dispatch to method_missing from one of our defined stub methods. This is how we get method_missing in Opal.
To optimise the generated code slightly, we reduce the code output from the compiler into the following JavaScript:
Opal.add_stubs(["first", "second", "to_sym"]);
You will see this at the top of all your generated JavaScript files. This will add a stub method for all methods used in your file.
The old approach was to inline method_missing calls by checking for a method on every method dispatch. This is still supported via a parser option, but not recommended.